Reader "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool." Richard Feynman Socrates, René Descartes, Carl Sagan, James Randi, Richard Feynman, and Penn & Teller were all practical skeptics. They demonstrated: Critical Inquiry: Asking tough questions and demanding clear evidence. Open-Mindedness: Being willing to change views when presented with better evidence. How about you? Are you a practical skeptic? “They” are trying to bend your mind (still and again)MindPrep 233 (HERE) and MindPrep 285 (HERE) posed the challenge that people and organizations are trying to influence our thinking. Sometimes this attempt is for a good reason (e.g., your parents, a teacher) and sometimes it’s for a not-so-good reason. And sometimes it seems so wild or goofy that you say, “How could anyone fall for that?” But we do. (Well, at least some of us do.)
Watch for red flagsUnrealistic Promises: If it sounds too good, it likely isn’t true. Upfront Payments: Legitimate offers don’t require fees to access rewards. Time Pressure: "Act now or lose this deal!" creates urgency to cloud judgment. Lack of Transparency: If the terms, conditions, or details seem vague or hidden, it’s a red flag. Everyday skepticism – 3 recommendationsAsk Key Questions:
Evaluate Sources: Check for credibility, authority, and potential biases. Follow the Money: Analyze motivations behind claims (e.g., financial incentives, political agendas). Bottom line: It pays to be a skeptic. May I ask a favor?If you like my weekly musing, please forward this to a friend or colleague. They can get on my email list, which is never shared, by clicking HERE. Cheers, Bill |
Four careers over 50+ years. USMC, engineering, consulting, education. Past twenty years have focused on helping leaders become and remain relevant during times of change.
Reader The last issue of MindPrep Reflections explored the concept of wicked world dragons and gave some examples of these dragons over the past 200 years. I ended that issue with a promise to look at the need to learn from the past, deal with the present, and intercept the future when considering the dragons in your world. Why? Learning from the past builds hindsight (wisdom from the past). Dealing with the present builds insight (clarity about the present). Intercepting the future requires...
Reader, I mentioned the dragon metaphor in the last issue of MindPrep. Why? Because they thrive in the wicked world in which we live and operate our businesses. This world is not just filled with puzzles, but also with complex challenges (good and bad) that morph as we try to resolve them. These challenges defy simple solutions. They blur the line between cause and effect and resist conventional planning. It’s a world where supply chains crumble, customer habits shift, and technology moves...
Reader The last issue of MindPrep ended with three realities: Linear thinking is obsolete. None of these frameworks support the notion that you can define a problem clearly, solve it once, and be done. Cause - effect relationships are scrambled. Strategy must be adaptive, not predictive. Wicked worlds, VUCA, and BANI all warn us to stop trying to control the uncontrollable. We must scan for signals, place bets, learn, and revise often. Emotions and cognition are inseparable. BANI highlights...