MindPrep 284 – Technological déjà vu?


Reader

I’m old enough to remember the dot-com bubble of 1999 – 2000 and the excitement of counting webpage-views (aka, “eyeballs”) while ignoring profitability. And now I’m living in the era of AI, cryptocurrency, and electric vehicles. Is this time different?

Dot-Com Bubble (late 1990s): The internet was a groundbreaking technology that promised to revolutionize communication, commerce, and society. Valuations skyrocketed as investors raced to get a piece of the "internet gold rush." We saw a new bookstore (amazon.com) and a short-lived pet supply retailer (pets.com).

Today’s Tech Boom (2020s): AI is hailed as the "new electricity," crypto promises decentralized financial systems, and EVs are seen as the solution to climate change. All are positioned as world-changing technologies.

In both eras, there’s an overarching belief that new technology will make traditional businesses and business metrics obsolete.

What can we learn from 1999 that might apply to today?

There are striking similarities between the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and the current excitement surrounding AI, cryptocurrency, and electric vehicles (EVs). While these technologies hold transformative potential, many of the same patterns of speculation, hype, and market exuberance are emerging.

Speculation

Dot-Com Era: Companies with no profits (e.g., Pets.com) raised millions in IPOs based on user growth and “potential future profits.”

Today:

  • AI: Startups with little more than a promising demo are receiving billion-dollar valuations.
  • Crypto: Many tokens and coins have inflated values driven by speculative trading rather than utility.
  • EVs: Companies like Tesla have reached extraordinary valuations, while newer EV startups often trade at unsustainable multiples despite limited production capacity.

Hype

Dot-Com Era: Media celebrated tech entrepreneurs as rock stars. Stories of overnight millionaires fueled retail investor fear of missing out.

Today: Influential figures like Elon Musk (Tesla) and Sam Altman (OpenAI) are honored as visionaries. Social media amplifies the hype cycle.

Market exuberance

Dot-Com Era: Loose monetary policies and investor optimism made capital cheap and accessible for startups.

Today: Recent years of low-interest rates and venture capital enthusiasm have funneled massive amounts of capital into tech startups, crypto projects, and EV manufacturers.

Boom and bust?

Dot-Com Bubble Outcome: The dot-com crash wiped out countless startups, but survivors like Amazon and eBay emerged stronger and reshaped global commerce.

Today’s Tech Boom: Many AI, crypto, and EV startups are likely to fail, but the strongest players (e.g., OpenAI, Bitcoin, Tesla) may dominate their industries post-shakeout.

Lessons from the Dot-Com Bubble for Today’s Market

  • Sustainability Over Hype: A flashy demo doesn’t guarantee long-term success.
  • Profitability Matters: Growth is important, but a clear path to sustainable profits is critical.
  • Beware of the Herd Mentality: Just because "everyone is investing" doesn’t mean it’s a sound decision.
  • Prepare for Market Cycles: Booms are followed by corrections.
  • Signal vs. Noise: Focus on companies solving real problems with clear, scalable business models.

Today

The technologies will endure, but many of today’s overvalued players will likely vanish in a correction. Also, China was not a “player” in 1999.

The challenge lies in identifying the Amazon-equivalents of this era and avoiding the Pets.com equivalents.

That’s all for now. Ken and I are discussing a series of half-day workshops for 2025. More information soon.

Cheers,

Bill

Bill @ MindPrep

Four careers over 50+ years. USMC, engineering, consulting, education. Past twenty years have focused on helping leaders become and remain relevant during times of change.

Read more from Bill @ MindPrep

Reader, Have you ever seen decisions that seemed like a great idea at the time—only to see them backfire later? For example, the widespread use of antibiotics saved millions of lives, but overuse led to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making some infections harder to treat. Or maybe you held on to your bestselling product for too long and you became irrelevant (Kodak). These are examples of unintended consequences—the hidden, second- and third-order effects of decisions that only become...

H5N1 Wikipedia

Reader, Foresight and the lack of it has been on my mind. Here's a short piece about "news" that has almost become background noise. Leaders should be paying more attention. Facts According to the CDC, as of February 21, 2025, the ongoing H5N1 avian influenza outbreak has led to the culling of approximately 162.8 million poultry in the United States. This extensive loss has significantly disrupted the egg industry, resulting in soaring prices and supply shortages. In January 2025 alone, over...

Reader, Did Sears Roebuck intercept the future of retailing? Did Tesla intercept the future of the automobile? Who is in the process of intercepting the future of “intelligence?’ For too many organizations the question of “Can we intercept the future of our industry?” is a work in progress. This issue of MindPrep continues our examination of the work associated with building and using foresight for our businesses and our careers. The last issue addressed the question of “Where is the future...