Reader , This is long (about a thousand words) so get a cup of coffee or a glass of wine. Part 1 of 2Many of you know that I’ve been writing about wicked worlds for a while and that my “summer project” is to write a follow-on to the 2006 book The Prepared Mind of a Leader. But while researching and thinking about wicked worlds I kept coming across two other acronyms, VUCA and BANI. Since all three might apply to my quest to explain and find tools for today’s mess I did a bit of investigating. Following is a quick overview of the three concepts and how they differ and overlap. Next week I’ll provide a bit “now what” and some tools for you to consider as you consider today’s challenges. WickedThe history of wicked systems thinking arises from the convergence of several intellectual streams across systems theory, planning, and leadership strategy, particularly in response to environments where traditional problem-solving fails. These are “wicked” environments in contrast to “kind.” “Kind environments” reward experience and have predictable rules (e.g., chess). Wicked environments, by contrast, lack clear rules, offer poor feedback, and demand experimentation and interdisciplinary thinking (e.g., water in the west).
Wicked systems thinking demands interdisciplinary collaboration, iterative learning, and a willingness to abandon expert intuition when past experience no longer applies. It’s not just about solving problems but navigating ecosystems where the very nature of the problem is in flux. VUCAThe term VUCA - short for Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous - originated in the U.S. military during the late 1980s and early 1990s, specifically in response to the end of the Cold War. With the fall of the Soviet Union and the collapse of the bipolar world order, U.S. military planners realized they were entering a new, unstable era where threats were less predictable and traditional strategies were inadequate. The U.S.Army War College coined the term VUCA to describe the new global security environment—one where clear enemies, alliances, and boundaries had blurred. In the early 2000s, business leaders and strategists began using VUCA to describe similar challenges in the corporate world - especially following events like:
Each of the four words highlights a different challenge for decision-makers: Volatile – The nature and speed of change are unpredictable.
Uncertain – There is a lack of clarity about the present and the future.
Complex – There are many variables and interconnected parts.
Ambiguous – Situations lack clear meaning or interpretation.
BANIBy the 2020s, some futurists (like those at the Institute for the Future) began arguing that VUCA didn’t go far enough in capturing the psychological and systemic turbulence of the modern world—hence the rise of BANI (Brittle, Anxious, Nonlinear, and Incomprehensible). Describing today’s world as BANI highlights a shift in how we understand volatility and complexity beyond the limitations of the older VUCA model. While VUCA captured the post-Cold War military and corporate landscape, BANI reflects a deeper fragility and unpredictability felt in 21st-century systems. However, describing a BANI world involves several nuanced issues: Following are a few examples of how BANI applies to today’s world. Brittle – Systems that appear stable but fail suddenly
Anxious – A reactive, high-stress environment driven by fear or overload
Nonlinear – Disproportionate or delayed effects
Incomprehensible – Events defy logic, patterns, or explanation
Wicked + VUCA + BANI = “Oh MY!”Each framework - Wicked, VUCA, and BANI - offers a different lens on the same reality. And when you examine the overlap among Wicked Worlds, VUCA, and BANI, a powerful and urgent message emerges: The world is no longer merely difficult – it’s fundamentally unstable, unknowable, and personal. Implications for leaders and decision makersHere are three realities: Linear thinking is obsolete. None of these frameworks support the notion that you can define a problem clearly, solve it once, and be done. Cause-effect is scrambled. Organizational silos MUST work together. Strategy must be adaptive, not predictive. Wicked worlds, VUCA, and BANI all warn us to stop trying to control the uncontrollable. We must scan for signals, place bets, learn, and revise often. Emotions and cognition are inseparable. My conclusion? We need to accept the Stockdale Paradox: “Plan like a pessimist, dream like an optimist.” And that, my friends, just might need a rewired mind. You’re in the middle – either give up or prepare for the adventure of your lifetimeNext week: Wicked? VUCA? BANI? All three? (Part 2)Face the brutal fact that we live in a wicked/VUCA/BANI world. Are you going to give up? Of course not. What are you going to do to survive and succeed? Rewire your thinking and face the dragons of a wicked world! I have some of the tools, tips, and techniques from the forthcoming book that I’ll share in Part 2. Until next week, Bill |
Four careers over 50+ years. USMC, engineering, consulting, education. Past twenty years have focused on helping leaders become and remain relevant during times of change.
Reader, Rin Duong I focus on strategic thinking for business leaders. Here are five things to ponder: Lifecycles are destiny. Products, businesses, even careers start, (hopefully) grow, mature, and decline. You need to rethink, reinvent, and reposition all of them as needed. Evolve at least as fast as your environment is evolving – or become irrelevant. AI is the most recent catalyst for business and career evolution. It won’t be the last. Customers age a day at a time. Tomorrow’s target...
Reader, Sometimes a picture is worth a lot of words, so this week’s issue of MindPrep Reflections is short and sweet. Charlotte Mills It’s always “today” when you decide, but every decision plays out in the future. In fact, every decision is a bet about the future. Sometimes the future is near and sometimes the future is far. Sometimes our decisions produce that results we want; and sometimes they don’t. If you want to make better decisions in the “here and now” you must do two things: 1....
Reader, Intercept the Future A few weeks ago (MindPrep 308) I introduced this cycle and provided some comments about the first stage of intercepting the future – scanning. I promised to jump into the second phase but was sidetracked about my IdeaQuake musings. Nonetheless, I’m back on track and have a few comments about the need to guess where the future is taking us. I say “a few comments” because the work associated with guessing about the future is hard work and we don’t have time for that...