Reflection: Ten Thoughts About Thinking


Reader,

I’m in the midst of reading The Future of Truth: How AI Reshapes Reality by Steven Rosenbaum. It’s interesting, well written, and a bit scary. I’ll send my notes in a future MindPrep Reflection.

Anyway, it got me thinking about thinking and some observations I’ve made over the years. Here are ten thoughts. The list is incomplete and I’m sure you have more. Send them along and I may include them in a future article.

  • You’re a sucker if you need to always be right. You will ignore or discount information that you disagree with. And that means you will stop learning.
  • Your circle of competence is smaller than you think. You have more opinions than you have facts. Don’t revert to BS explanations.
  • Ideology is a good compass, but a dangerous map. Consider your real values and chart your own path.
  • Yes, you are biased, but you can’t see it. Find a friend who’s brutally honest.
  • People are trying to deceive you, even your “tribe.” Trust, but verify.
  • Do you want the truth, or do you want to win? The truth can be ugly and may interfere with your desire to win. If winning rules, truth loses.
  • Value truth. If truth is unimportant, you will be seduced by lies.
  • Be skeptical and think critically. We live in a confusing, wicked world.
  • Know your enemy. Who is actively trying to sway your actions? Beware of emotions hijacking your thinking.
  • Everyone has an agenda – what is it? This is especially the case with social media. Ask “What’s the story here?”

Real literacy encompasses much more than the ability to read and write. We have to think, and I’m worried about our population’s continued ability to “go deep.” Life in the shallows is too easy. Don’t let others tell you what to think.

In closing, here’s a quote from the book: “Truth in the age of AI is no longer static or singular. It is dynamic, layered and often intentionally inconsistent. We move between physical experience, digital platforms, and simulated systems, assembling meaning as we go. The skill now required is not passive belief but active navigation.” (Underling added because of my soon-to-be published book, Navigating the Wicked World.)

Cheers,

Bill

Bill @ MindPrep

Four careers over 50+ years. USMC, engineering, consulting, education. Past twenty years have focused on helping leaders become and remain relevant during times of change.

Read more from Bill @ MindPrep
360 era

Reader, I’ve been writing about wicked worlds and wicked problems for a year or so, but I don’t want you to think that these are new. Here’s a story that’s over 30 years old. IBM was in deep trouble in 1993. Its mainframe-centered business model was weakening. Personal computing was reshaping the industry. The company was losing billions of dollars. Its major divisions operated with competing priorities, and many experts believed IBM should be broken into smaller businesses. At first glance,...

Reader, Here are a few reflections about some past business failures. What happens when ....... Weak signals are dismissed? You get Nokia. Smartphone interfaces, software ecosystems, developer platforms and changing customer expectations were visible before Nokia’s handset collapse. An old mental model is retained? You get Kodak. They understood digital photography but continued to interpret the market through the economics of film, processing, and printing. Problems are defined too narrowly?...

SpaceX on Unsplash

Reader My first “career move” was time in the Marine Corps. And so, sixty years later, I’m still interested in military history. One of my favorite books is Miliary Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure in War (Cohen and Gooch, 1990). The book was centered on failure modes and how they can interact. The point of the book is that there are three failure modes and when they interact they can result in catastrophe. They are: Failure to learn Failure to anticipate Failure to adapt The authors...