|
Reader, Leaders must bring their organizations into the future, and that requires imagination. Why? Well, we have no data from the future, only from the past and the present. We have no choice but to imagine what the future will entail. When Jean and I were drafting The Prepared Mind of a Leader I thought we needed to look at respected science fiction writers and analyze how they “see” the future and build their mental models of what it will look like. Yes, imagination is needed, but we must also be willing to let go of today, our expertise may get in the way. Consider the story of Arthur C. Clarke, one of the most respected authors of science fiction who started writing stories about the future in the 1950s. I read one of his earliest books, The Sands of Mars published in 1951 to see if I could use his approach for "seeing the future" for my clients. The story was about a reporter’s trip to the “Red Planet.” Clarke’s description of the atomic engines that powered the spacecraft made sense inasmuch as atomic power was then a reality and scientists and engineers were speculating as to how it might be used. Likewise, even though no one had been in space, his descriptions of weightless space travel and dealing with the vacuum of space were well imagined. And he clearly understood the need for minimizing weight in the rocket to conserve fuel. And that’s where his expertise as a writer got in the way. Clarke describes a scene in which the main character, the reporter, needed to document his experience of space flight. In preparation for writing his report, our fictional reporter pulled out his lightweight typewriter and a pack of ultralight carbon paper that he would use to retain a copy after he sent the original report back to earth in a miniature rocket. You see, Clarke was a writer and he just “knew” that a good typewriter was an essential tool and that a good portable was clearly state-of-the-art technology. Although calculating machines (early computers) had been used during WWII to calculate artillery and naval gun trajectories, they used numbers, not words, and he missed a clue about the future. Email was not considered. His inability to invent a new means of preparing a report was hampered by his inability to see beyond something he knew so well. A typewriter was permanently etched in his mental model. What about us?As you construct your vision of your future, the model should include the probability of surprise. Furthermore, you need to look actively for things that would affect your mental model. And a good bet is that you will find that some of your assumptions are fragile. Consider three assumption-types.
Care to learn from the past?As many of you know, I’ve been writing about the need to “learn from the past, deal with the present, and intercept the future.” If you’d like some interesting history lessons and how they might apply to intercepting your future, you can grab Ten from Then which has ten short history snippets and some comments about “what causes the future.” The link is HERE. Cheers, Bill |
Four careers over 50+ years. USMC, engineering, consulting, education. Past twenty years have focused on helping leaders become and remain relevant during times of change.
Reader, I’ve been wondering about some thinking disciplines and whether or not they need to be emphasized and improved in leadership education. I received my MBA late in the 1970s and I know I improved my knowledge and skills in accounting, finance, marketing, operations, management theory, and more. An unstated intention of the program was to improve my thinking skills, but such skills were not addressed directly. Functional knowledge is certainly important. However, after many years in the...
Reader, This is a bit long. Go grab a cup of coffee. I’ve been writing about wicked systems and wicked problems for a while. I was reading about the latest competing opinions about the Iran war’s resolution, and I realized that it’s a good example of wicked problems. The current Iran conflict possesses nearly all the defining characteristics identified by Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber in their 1973 work on wicked problems. The conflict is not merely “difficult” or “complicated.” AS we have...
Reader, My most recent birthday was one of those “big ones.” Two dials advanced! I was reflecting on my careers and on the changing world in which we live. That took me back a bunch of years to my very first real job – delivering the Chicago Daily News on my bicycle. That, in turn, got me thinking about the big picture of newspapers and “the news.” “Back in the day” Chicago had four daily newspapers. In the morning you could read the Chicago Tribune or the Chicago Sun Times. In the late...