|
Reader As you may (or may not) recall from the last Reflection, TJ was challenging an old guy (me) about writing today. After all, I’m full of “old information” and the world has changed a LOT. At the end of last week’s reflection, I commented on Ackoff’s concept of “formulating the mess.” Here are some notes on the application of his thinking to today’s world. I’ve mentioned the concept of system wickedness in several reflections so I’m not going to dig into that. However, although understanding that we are operating in a wicked world is necessary, it is not sufficient. After recognizing the wickedness of any system, the leading question should no longer be “What should we do?” but “How should we think before doing anything at all?” This is where formulating the mess comes into play. This concept came from the work and writing of Russ Ackoff in the 1970s. He was one of the leaders of the systems thinking discipline and saw the growing reality of messy problems that were actually a collection of intertwining problems. Want an example? When Hillary Clinton led the 1993–1994 reform effort during Bill Clinton’s presidency, she was not confronting a discrete policy flaw. She was confronting a deeply entangled system with structural interdependencies, conflicting stakeholder definitions, delayed feedback, and political volatility. These are classic characteristics of a wicked environment. Ackoff’s point was that you cannot “solve” a mess you can only navigate it and make it better. And that starts with formulation. Formulation is the act of constructing a shared understanding of a problematic situation as a system of interrelated issues, stakeholders, constraints, and dynamics before attempting to improve it. Formulation replaces the impulse to simplify with the responsibility to understand. It must come before strategy, before decision-making, and before action. You must understand the system. 2026 MessesAckoff wrote about messes in the 1970s. Clinton wrestled with one in the 1990s. What must we navigate today? Here are three to consider:
What Ackoff Meant by “Formulation”Formulation is not problem definition in the conventional sense. Recognize that:
Core ActionsAckoff never presented formulation as a checklist, but his work implies a sequence of actions.
Only now is the system ready for intervention. My ViewWill AI formulate our messes for us? I don’t think so. Our responsibility is to understand the system well enough so that improvement is possible, before action (or inaction) makes things worse. Ackoff saw that clearly in the 1970s and it still applies today. Humans, young and old, must take responsibility for our future. Bill |
Four careers over 50+ years. USMC, engineering, consulting, education. Past twenty years have focused on helping leaders become and remain relevant during times of change.
Reader, In December 1952, London disappeared. London, 1952 A temperature inversion trapped coal smoke over the city and visibility dropped to feet. Smog wasn’t new and “dirty air” was so normal that people had adapted to it. London relied heavily on coal for a long time. They needed it for home heating, power generation, and industrial operations. And because of the cold, residents were burning more coal to stay warm However, the coal used was high in sulfur and when burned, it produced:...
Reader, So, why should I write another book? TJ posed that question and not-so-subtly challenged me with “Sure, you’re kind of smart, but as an old dude your knowledge is out of date. After all, The Prepared Mind of a Leader was published twenty years ago.” 2006 The point of the 2006 book was to examine the skills leaders needed to be better prepared for a changing world. Is 2026 really that different from 2006? Maybe not, but I think leaders at all levels are being challenged in new ways....
Reader, Here’s the draft introduction to a forthcoming book which is still untitled. Leadership When the World Will Not Sit Still Many leaders today have come to an unsettling realization: the word in which they are leading no longer behaves in ways for which their experience prepared them. Problems do not stay solved. Decisions trigger consequences far from where they were made. Actions intended to stabilize the organization often introduce new forms of instability. Stakeholders disagree not...